New products every week, and the first call is whether one is worth following
With products appearing constantly, the founder cares about two things: whether one is worth following, and how it differs from his own direction. Official claims must be kept apart from what has actually been verified, and research has to leave references that can be checked, extended or corrected later.
Start from primary materials and record how far verification went
The research agent reads official documentation, blog posts, source code and papers first, then takes apart the mechanisms and differences. Its notes separate what a source claims from what was checked in that round, with a verification list showing what a conclusion rests on and what is still open.
The notes go straight into competitor comparisons and the business plan
Structured notes accumulate in a research library and feed the competitor comparisons and materials for the business plan directly. When a new question comes up, the team goes back to the original sources and earlier judgments, adds verification, and every past effort takes part in the next decision.
Result
How research is reused · Team account
Primary sources scattered everywhereReferenced notes that go straight into the plan
“We have to get accuracy and completeness right, without being so strict that knowledge can no longer be added or revised.”
Try it in your own work
Bring one specific product question and a few reference links, and have the agent lay out the differences, sources and open questions
See how to begin