Twenty-plus repositories, and every issue needs a decision first
Issues were spread across twenty-plus repositories, and someone had to judge scope, dependencies and readiness for each. Handing them straight to automation led to endless retries and speculative edits. The team wanted the judgment made first, so only eligible changes entered execution.
CogineWork schedules the work, Codex CLI does the building
The team gives CogineWork the repository rules and task requirements. It filters and labels issues, builds a work package for each, dispatches Codex CLI to write the code and keeps every worker cycling. People set the entry conditions and widen scope and pace as trust grows.
Changes land as draft PRs, and people write rules and review
Eligible tasks advance automatically to draft pull requests for human review. Blocked tasks are sent back for reproduction and diagnosis, then narrowed and reassigned. The engineers now write rules, judge failures and do final review instead of assigning issues one by one.
Result
How tasks advance · Team account
Issues assigned by hand, one at a timeThe factory advances them by rule into draft PRs
“CogineWork analyses and labels the issues, builds the work packages and keeps cycling the workers. The worker can be whatever coding agent your team already uses.”
Try it in your own work
Pick a small, well-bounded issue, add your repository rules, and let the agent prepare a reviewable change first
See how to begin